Cartagena

Gregorio was right.

Cartagena has a very long history. 50.000 years ago Neader speakers lived in a cave close to the city's current location. Many years later, when the breed had become extinct, an Iberian tribe established a settlement in the area. A natural harbor and rich deposits of silver created the conditions for a significant trade with the outside world.

In the year 227 BC, the city was occupied by the Punic (Phoenicians) and became a military hub for the possessions on the Iberian Peninsula. It was from here that the army commander Hannibal with an army of 38.000 infantrymen, 8.000 cavalrymen and 38 elephants started his campaign (the "Alpine expedition") towards Rome.

While Hannibal was on his campaign, a Roman army captured the city and gained control of the silver mines. The extraction was expanded. At one point, 40.000 slaves worked in the mines. The silver from here made a significant contribution to the financing of the expansion of the Roman Empire.

The city was named Carthago Nova (the new Carthago) and gained 200 years later under Caesar status as a Roman colony.

When the Roman Empire fell, the city was destroyed by the Vandals in the year 425 and rebuilt 125 years later, when it became part of the Byzantine Empire

Under the Moors, the city became subject to the Emirate of Cordoba. The Christians entered the city of 500 years later and named it Cartagena.

In the latter half of the 16 century, the city's harbor once again became an important military port.

Cartagena's recent history is marked by ups and downs.

So maybe Gregorio will be right that Cartagena will experience progress within the next 5-10 years if the tourist interest develops as he expects.

 

Thank you for reading the report 

We love hearing from readers.

Greetings, comments or questions?

Fire away

...everything is welcome

Subscribe to comments
send me a mail
guest
2 Comments
Inline feedback
View all comments
Thue
Thue
8. February 2017 11: 43

Not related to your post - but it has occurred to me that you think I should go swimming!

Now it is the case that I have acquired a boat, for various reasons, one of them is that it allows the dry shoe to cross water - without swimming 🙂

Furthermore, I prefer to have guests on board who can NOT swim, the theory behind this is that non-swimmers are supposed to take better care of the ship!

Thue

Feel free to share 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies. 

2
0
Write your greeting here ... x
()
x

New reports?

We make a story or film once in a while. 

Don't miss them.

Sign up for the list.

You will then receive the new ones by mail